Today, we delve into the concept that many are familiar with – the citizen's arrest. What sets it apart from law enforcement's actions, and does it not imply a distinction between police officers and ordinary citizens? As we explore the idea of citizen's arrests, questions arise about its logical, moral, and ethical underpinnings.
In every state, a form of citizen's arrest exists, with a common thread dictating that the detained individual must be handed over to the nearest police station promptly. However, a fundamental question arises: If a citizen witnesses a police officer violating the rights of the innocent, why should they turn the offending officer over to a system that has, at times, shielded them from accountability? Is there not a call for establishing new courts that dispense justice impartially?
Despite claims that the current system holds corrupt officers accountable, the reality is more complex. Some officers face consequences for egregious violations, but the sentences are often lenient. Moreover, daily duties often compel law enforcement to infringe upon the rights of innocent individuals. On a daily basis all police officers are paid to violate the rights to life, liberty and happiness pursuit of the innocent
The prevailing government, often perceived as tyrannically oppressive, employs armed forces to enforce laws not universally consented to by its citizens. Police officers are tasked with compelling innocent individuals to obey these laws, violating their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Refusing to stand idly by, there is a call to stop funding this system through taxes and to arrest those responsible for infringing upon the rights of the innocent, including loyalists, politicians, active military personnel, and police officers.
Rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are being systematically violated. Economic structures force labor exploitation, and regulations restrict personal freedoms. Imagine if, collectively, we organized, peaceably assembled, and withdrew consent from this oppressive regime to form new governments aligned with our interests.
History, however, reveals the government's resistance to such endeavors. The Civil War stands as a stark example where attempts at independence were quelled. The current system, fueled by our taxes, seems resolute in suppressing any movement toward justice and independence.
In unity, there is strength. As we contemplate a future free from oppression, the call persists for collective action, challenging the status quo and paving the way for a society where justice is not just a term but a lived reality for all.